The German language items (and the original English
language items) are:
|
(1) Manchmal pendelt meine Stimmung mehrmals zwischen glücklich
und traurig in einer einzigen Woche.
I may change from happy to sad and back again several times in a single week. (2) Ich fühle mich meist ziemlich fröhlich. I usually feel quite cheerful. (3) Meine Stimmung ist oft bedrückt. I'm frequently "down in the dumps". (4) Ich sehe im allgemeinen mehr die Sonnenseiten des Lebens. I generally look at the sunny side of life. (5) Verglichen mit meinen Freunden gehen meine Stimmungen weniger rauf und runter. Compared to my friends, I'm less up and down in my mood states. (6) Ich bin selten in wirklicher Hochstimmung. I'm not often really elated. (7) Manchmal schwankt meine Stimmung sehr schnell hin und her. Sometimes my moods swing back and forth very rapidly. (8) Ich fühle mich meist so, als ob ich vor Freude übersprudeln würde. I usually feel as though I'm bubbling over with joy. (9) Meine Stimmungen sind sehr konsistent; sie ändern sich fast nie. My moods are quite consistent; they almost never vary. (10) Ich halte mich für eine glückliche Person. I consider myself a happy person. (11) Verglichen mit meinen Freunden denke ich weniger optimistisch über das Leben. Compared to my friends, I think less positively about life in general. (12) Ich bin eine Person, die sich oft ändert. I'm a very changeable person. (13) Ich bin nicht so fröhlich wie die meisten Leute. I am not as cheerful as most people. (14) Ich bin weniger von meinen Stimmungen abhängig als die meisten Leute, die ich kenne. I'm not as "moody" as most people I know. (15) Meine Freunde scheinen oft zu glauben, daß ich unglücklich bin. My friends often seem to feel I am unhappy. The scale values range from 1 ("trifft auf mich überhaupt nicht
zu") |
Bohner et al. reported that the German adaptation has the same factorial
structure as the English version. They found that the "subscales show
a moderate negative inter-correlation and a high level of internal consistency
and test-retest-reliability, over a five-week-period. The scores are independent
of social desirability and are meaningfully correlated with personality
measures of sociability and level of activation" (Bohner et al., 1991,
p.135).
The present paper presents a replication of some findings of Underwood
and Froming (1980) and Bohner et al. (1991). By relating the mood subscales
to the Big Five and several additional personality factors which have not
been regarded in previous research it provides some new information on
mood-personality correlations.
| Item | Mood Level | Reactivity |
| 2 | .79 | -- |
| 10 | .75 | -- |
| 4 | .75 | -- |
| 6 | .74 | -- |
| 8 | .69 | -- |
| 13 | .69 | -- |
| 11 | .68 | -- |
| 3 | .65 | -.34 |
| 15 | .48 | -- |
| 7 | -- | .83 |
| 9 | -- | .79 |
| 1 | -- | .78 |
| 5 | -- | .73 |
| 14 | -- | .64 |
| 12 | -- | .52 |
In accordance with previous findings the factorial structure is clear-cut. With the exception of item 3 no secondary loading exceeds 0.3 in absolute value. In the original version this item had a loading of the same magnitude on both factors (Underwood and Froming, 1980, study II); in the German version, however, it clearly belonged to the Level factor (0.66 vs. 0.32; Bohner et al., 1991).
Scale values were computed as unweighted means of the 9 Level and the 6 Reactivity items, respectively. The alpha reliabilities are 0.870 and 0.829. These values are slightly higher than Bohner et al.'s (0.86 and 0.78). Dropping item 15 would raise the internal consistency of the Level scale to 0.872; and deletion of item 12 would raise the reliability of the Reactivity scale to 0.843.
Table 2 shows the frequency distribution of the scale values.
| Percentile | |||||||
| 10 | 25 | 50 | 75 | 90 | Mean | Std.dev. | |
| Mood Level | 2.44 | 3.00 | 3.56 | 4.00 | 4.44 | 3.49 | 0.75 |
| Reactivity | 2.17 | 2.67 | 3.33 | 4.00 | 4.33 | 3.28 | 0.85 |
Females had significantly higher values on the Level scale (3.60 vs. 3.38; t=3.87, p<0.001), i.e., females reported to be happier than males. They also had significantly higher Reactivity values (3.41 vs. 3.15; t=3.89, p<0.001), i.e., females reported more frequent and more intensive mood changes. These sex differences are only partly consistent with previous findings. Both Underwood and Froming and Bohner et al. reported significantly higher Reactivity values for females but no significant difference on the Level subscale.
Replicating the findings of Underwood and Froming and Bohner et al. the two subscales were negatively correlated (r=-0.34; p<0.001). Controlling for sex of subject yields an inter-scale-correlation of -0.38 (p<0.001).
To check the concurrent validity of the Stimmungsskala the mood scales were correlated with several external personality measures. A principal component analysis of the 67 bipolar adjective scales yielded 8 factors accounting for 53.4 percent of the variance (Henss, 1996). Using Varimax rotation, 8 orthogonal factors were extracted and factor scores computed. The factors were straightforwardly interpretable as the Big Five factors Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Emotional Stability and Intellect/Openness, as well as Physical Attractiveness, Health, and Arousal/Happiness. The left part of table 3 shows the correlations between the mood scales and the external personality factors. Also included are the correlations with present arousal and pleasure as measured by the Affect Grid, age, self reported height and weight, and the derived Body Mass Index (BMI = weight in kg / height in cm2).
| Simple Correlation | Partial Correlation | |||
| Mood Level | Reactivity | Mood Level | Reactivity | |
| Extraversion | .41 | n.s. | .43 | .17 |
| Agreeableness | .14 | -.20 | n.s | -.19 |
| Conscientiousness | -.09 | -.13 | -.17 | -.19 |
| Emotional Stability | .38 | -.40 | .34 | -.25 |
| Intellect/Openness | n.s. | .14 | .14 | .18 |
| Arousal/Happiness | .46 | -.23 | .41 | n.s. |
| Physical Attractiveness | .17 | n.s. | .16 | .08 |
| Health | .12 | n.s. | .08 | n.s. |
| Grid Pleasure | .46 | -.21 | .40 | n.s. |
| Grid Arousal | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. |
| Age | n.s. | -.18 | -.10* | -.19* |
| Body Height | -.15 | -.11 | n.s. | n.s. |
| Body Weight | -.13 | -.15 | n.s. | -.08 |
| Body Mass Index | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. |
Positive mood as measured by the Level scale correlates positively
with state pleasure as measured by the Affect Grid (0.46), and factor
scores on Arousal/Happiness (0.46), Extraversion (0.41),
and Emotional Stability (0.38).
Frequency and intensity of mood changes as measured by the Reactivity
scale are negatively related to the Big Five factor Emotional Stability
(-0.40).
Because Level and Reactivity are negatively correlated
and because of the significant sex differences partial correlations were
computed for each subscale while controlling for the other and sex of subject.
Since both mood scales were significantly correlated with age, age of subject
was also partialled out. The partial correlations are reported in the right
part of table 3. Controlling for Reactivity and sex and age of subject
has little effect on the Level-personality correlations. The positive
correlations with Grid Pleasure, Extraversion, Arousal/Happiness
and Emotional Stability remain of the same magnitude. On the other
hand the correlation between Reactivity and Emotional Stability
drops from -0.40 to -0.25 when the influence of Level, sex and age
are removed.
For both mood scales there are several additional significant correlations.
These, however, are rather low.
1The third factor of the three-factor solution is constituted by items 12 and 15. This factor would be difficult to interpret.