|
RONALD
HENSS Fachrichtung Psychologie Universität des Saarlandes D-66041 Saarbrücken Germany |
|
|
Selected
Publications Face Perception, Physical Attractiveness, Waist-to-Hip Ratio, Evolutionary Psychology, Personality Psychology, Big Five, Lexical Approach, Mood, Hair, Male Pattern Baldness, Mate Choice |
| Henss, R. (2001). Social perceptions of male pattern baldness. Dermatology + Psychosomatics, 2, 63-71. | ||
|
Key Words
|
Male pattern baldness, androgenetic
alopecia, social perceptions, face perception, personality judgments,
socio-cultural aspects of hair and hair loss
|
|
|
Summary
|
The paper presents
a review of the empirical literature on strangers' perceptions of male
pattern baldness (androgenetic alopecia). It also discusses some socio-cultural
aspects of hair in general, and hair loss in particular.
|
|
| Henss, R. (2000). Waist-to-hip ratio and female attractiveness. Evidence from photographic stimuli and methodological considerations. Personality and Individuall Differences, 28, 501-513. | ||
|
Key Words
|
Waist-to-Hip ratio, female attractiveness,
human figure, evolutionary psychology, personality judgment, photographs
vs. line drawings, ecological validity
|
|
|
Summary
|
There are a large number
of empirical studies supporting the evolutionary psychological prediction
that the waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) is an important attribute of female
attractiveness. In contrast to previous research, which is almost exclusively
based on line drawings, the present study used color photographs as stimuli
. For each of six attractive females there were the original photograph
and two digitally manipulated pictures, one depicting a lower and one
depicting a higher WHR. In a between subjects design the pictures were
rated by 180 males and 180 females. The ratings were done on 108 scales
covering a broad range of the personality sphere. A factor analysis of
these scales yielded seven factors. Only one of these factors was significantly
affected by the WHR manipulation, namely Attractiveness. In accordance
with evolutionary psychological expectations a lower ratio was more attractive
than a higher one. In addition to the empirical findings, some methodological
issues are discussed. It is argued that, compared with face research,
research on the human figure is in a poor state.
|
|
| Henss, R. (1998). Type nouns and the Five Factor Model of personality description. European Journal of Personality, 12, 57-71. | ||
|
Key Words
|
Type nouns, lexical approach, personality
judgments, Big Five, physical attractiveness, celebrities
|
|
|
Summary
|
Research in the tradition
of the lexical approach has been largely confined to adjective rating
scales. Another word class that appears particularly suited for personality
description is the class of type nouns (e.g. extravert, misanthrope, leader,
coward, intellectual). This paper presents the first investigation in
the factorial structure of a relatively large set of German type nouns.
Stimulus persons were 12 prominent males (e.g. Boris Becker, Helmut Kohl)
and 12 prominent females (e.g. Claudia Schiffer, Steffi Graf). Raters
were 240 men and 240 women. Each rater judged one stimulus person on 192
unipolar type noun scales and 32 biploar adjective scales. Factor analyses
of the type nouns yielded seven factors for males and six for females.
These factors represented a clear-cut and meaningful personality structure.
Comparisons with the adjective factors (seven male and six female) demonstrated
that the noun factors show some resemblance to the Big Five and Physical
Attractiveness. Multiple regression analyses showed that the noun factors
cannot be completely reduced to the Big Five. Some systematic differences
between male and female stimuli are also discussed.
|
|
| Henss, R. (1996). Fantasy, wishful thinking, and statistical hokuspokus. A rejoinder to De Raad and Ostendorf (1966). European Journal of Personality, 10, 157-160. | ||
|
Key Words
|
Lexical approach, personality description,
taxonomy, type nouns
|
|
|
Summary
|
De Raad and Ostendorf
(1996) harshly criticize a paper of mine in which I presented empirical
evidence that the number of personality descriptive type nouns in the
German language has been grossly underestimated by the Bielefeld research
team (Henss, 1995). In my opinion, most of the arguments put forward by
De Raad and Ostendorf are untenable. Although there are a long line of
shortcomings in De Raad and Ostendorfs paper, I will confine my
rejoinder to some of the most important aspects.
|
|
| Henss, R. (1995). From Aal to Zyniker. Personality-descriptive type nouns in the German language. European Journal of Personality, 9, 135-145. | ||
|
Key Words
|
Lexical approach, personality description,
taxonomy, type nouns
|
|
|
Summary
|
Up until now it has
been assumed that the German language comprises of far more personality-descriptive
adjectives (e.g. cynical) than type nouns (e.g. cynic); cf. Angleitner
et al. (1990). The present paper shows that this conclusion is unwarranted.
Firstly, it is demonstrated that the German taxonomers considered only
a small fraction of the relevant type nouns. Then follows a discussion
of why the German language contains a huge number of personality type
nouns. Finally, some pitfalls of the lexical approach to personality-description
are considered.
|
|
| Henss, R. (1995). Das Fünf-Faktoren-Modell der Persönlichkeit bei der Beurteilung von Gesichtern. (The five factor model of personality in judgments of strangers' faces). Report Psychologie, 20/3, 28-39. | ||
|
Key Words
|
personality impressions of strangers'
faces; five factor model of personality; physical atttractiveness, mood
|
|
|
Summary
|
Two experiments investigated
the personality structure emerging from ratings of strangers' faces. In
experiment 1 photographs of 21 males and 21 females (age range: 20-60)
were judged by a group of 924 subjects. Each judge rated a single photograph
on a personality differential consisting of 89 rating scales. Each photograph
was rated by 11 men and 11 women. In experiment 2 a different set of photographs
(36 men, 36 women; age range: 20-60) were rated by 864 subjects. Each
picture was judged by 6 males and 6 females on a 90 scale personality
differential. The differentials were intended to measure the big five
personality factors as well as several facets of physical attractiveness
and perceived mood states. Factor analyses yielded four "big"
factors. Three of these were homogenous in content and easy to interpret:
Physical Attractiveness, Mood/Extraversion, and Agreeableness. By extracting
a larger number of factors two further components of the five factor model
could be replicated, namely Conscientiousness and Intellect/Openness.
Big five factor IV (Emotional Stability) could not be identified. In its
place a Self-Assertiveness factor was found in both analyses. For this
factor some differences could be uncovered in the loading patterns of
male and female faces, respectively.
|
|
| Henss, R. (1995). Waist-to-Hip Ratio and Attractiveness. Replication and Extension. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 479-488. | ||
|
Key Words
|
waist-to-hip ratio, physical attractiveness,
body weight, Big Five, personality judgments
|
|
|
Summary
|
In several experiments
Singh (1993a,b,c; Singh & Luis, 1995) presented evidence that the
attractiveness of the female figure is related to the waist-to-hip ratio
and the apparent overall body weight. The present paper presents a replication
and extension of the Singh studies. Both female and male figures are considered.
In addition to different aspects of physical attractiveness, the so called
Big Five factors of personality are considered. Both similarities and
differences between the Singh studies and the present study are discussed.
|
|
| Henss, R. (1995). Misses Germany, Titelmädchen des Jahres, Playmate des Jahres usw. Zur Urteilerübereinstimmung bei öffentlichen Schönheitswettbewerben und in psychologischen Experimenten. [Misses Germany, Cover Girl of the Year, Playmate of the Year, and so on ... Consensus in public beauty contests and in psychological experiments]. Psychologische Beiträge, 37, 124-135. | ||
|
Key Words
|
physical attractiveness, consensus,
agreement, inter-rater-correlations, beauty pageant
|
|
|
Summary
|
The question of amount
of consensus in judgments of attractiveness is addressed by analyses of
public beauty contests and a brief meta analysis of the attractiveness
research literature. Two different types of public beauty contests are
considered, namely contests conducted by magazines or journals, and "classical"
beauty pageants. In the first group of contests, a set of photographs
are depicted in a magazine and the readers are requested to choose their
"favorite" simply by indicating their first preference. An analysis
of 19 such contests indicated that there is usually sufficient consensus
among judges. By comparing the official results with findings from two
experiments in which the contestants were rank ordered by 66 and 39 subjects,
respectively, some methodological problems of 'magazine contests' are
discussed. In particular, it is demonstrated that the 'first-preference-method'
can yield undesirable results if there is one candidate who splits the
judges into contrasting groups of pro and contra. In the second group
of contests - that is "classical" beauty pageants - judgments
are delivered by a small group of jurors who apportion a fixed number
of points to the contestants. The complete data from 11 state-wide final
decisions of the election for "Misses Germany 1991" were available.
Analyses of the data showed substantial agreement among judges (mean inter-rater
correlations between 0.28 and 0.79; median: 0.34). However, it is criticized
that the number of jurors is usually rather small. The last part of paper
presents a meta analysis of consensus among judges as reported in the
attractiveness research literature. A perusal of approximately one thousand
research articles yielded 393 mean inter-rater correlations. For the whole
data set the interquartile ranged from 0.29 to 0.54, with a median of
0.43. There were no differences between male and female judges (63 and
70 coefficients, respectively). However, there was a clear difference
between male and female stimulus persons (115 vs. 161 coefficients). Although
there was substantial agreement in judgments of male stimuli (interquartile:
0.23 - 0.49; median: 0.35), consensus was higher when the stimulus persons
were female (0.31 - 0.54; median: 0.42). A cross tabulation by mode of
representation of the stimulus persons indicated highest concordances
for live judgments (0.40 - 0.69; median: 0.50; N=66), and lowest consensus
for photo ratings (0.26 - 0.50; median: 0.39; N=282). Video ratings yielded
intermediate values (0.41 - 0.60; median: 0.49; N=33).
|
|
| Henss, R. (1994). Dimensionen der Ähnlichkeit von Gesichtern. Eine Kreuzvalidierung. (Dimensions of similarity of faces. A cross-validation study). Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 41, 398-414. | ||
|
Key Words
|
similarity of faces; physiognomic features;
five factor model of personality; physical attractiveness; age; multidimensional
scaling; multiple regression; cross validation
|
|
|
Summary
|
Using a series of three
experiments a cross validation study on dimensions of similarity among
faces was carried out. In experiment 1, one hundred subjects sorted two
sets of facial photographs (61 men, 62 women; age range: 20-60) into groups
of faces similar in appearance. In experiment 2, a group of 864 subjects
rated a subset of 36 male and 36 female faces on a personality differential
consisting of 90 scales and a physiognomic differential consisting of
29 scales. Each judge rated a single photograph on all scales. In experiment
3, the complementary subsets of 25 male and 26 female faces were rated
by a third group of 48 subjects. Each judge rated one set of photographs
on eight different scales from the personality sphere. Nonmetric multidimensional
scaling (ALSCAL) was carried out on the similarity judgments obtained
in experiment 1. Using multiple regression techniques the ratings from
experiment 2 were regressed on the coordinates of the similarity spaces.
About two thirds of the personality scales and nearly half of the physiognomic
scales could be fitted into the three-dimensional similarity space. By
using factor values in place of scale values, the big five personality
factors as well as physical attractiveness and age could be fitted into
the three-dimensional space. The regression coefficients obtained in experiment
2 were used to predict the scale values of the complementary subset of
stimulus persons in experiment 3. Except for one scale ("unlogical
- logical") the cross validation was extraordinarily successful.
|
|
| Henss, R.(1993). Kontexteffekte bei der Beurteilung der physischen Attraktivität (Context effects in judgments of physical attractiveness). In M. Hassebrauck & R. Niketta (eds.). Physische Attraktivität (Physical attractiveness). Göttingen: Hogrefe (pp.61-94). | ||
|
Key Words
|
physical attractiveness, context effects,
range-frequency-theory, height estimates
|
|
|
Summary
|
The paper contains
a review of research on context effects in judgments of physical attractiveness,
and it presents findings from the author's own research. Based on a classification
scheme by Higgins & Stangor (1988), part one contains a systematization
of context effects within the realm of attractiveness research. In part
two a brief outline of Parducci's range-frequency theory is presented,
and the relevant literature is discussed from this theoretical perspective.
Part three presents findings from the author's research. Two experiments
tested predictions derived from range-frequency theory in connection with
assumptions about differential correlations between attractiveness and
body height for men and women, respectively. In the first experiment (cf.
Henss, 1989), 136 females estimated the body height of male stimulus persons
based on head-and-shoulder photographs. The target persons, who were of
average attractiveness as determined by a pre-test, were estimated taller
when the context person were less attractive, as opposed to more attractive
context persons. In a subsequent experiment, which was based on a 2x2x2
(sex of judges x sex of stimuli x attractiveness of context persons) design,
288 subjects provided both attractiveness ratings and height estimates.
As expected, a contrast effect was found for attractiveness ratings. This
effect was not qualified by sex of judges or sex of judged. Consistent
with the assumption that being tall can be an asset for men while it is
of rather low importance for women, height estimates showed the following
pattern: The attractiveness manipulation had no effect on height estimates
when the stimulus persons were female. Furthermore, there was no attractiveness
context effect on height estimates when male subjects judged male stimulus
persons. However, there was a clear contrast effect when females judged
photographs of males. As in the preceding experiment, the targets were
estimated taller when the context persons were less attractive as compared
to context persons of higher attractiveness. In addition, the question
of comparability of relative and absolute judgments is addressed. In one
experiment, 240 subjects from different age groups rated the attractiveness
of 21 men and 21 women, respectively (age range: 20-60). In this experiment,
each judge rated a complete set of 21 photos (cf. Henss, 1991). In another
experiment, the same photographs were judged by 924 subjects. However,
each judge rated only one stimulus person. The mean attractiveness ratings
obtained in both experiments were very similar, indicating that there
are no substantial differences between relative and absolute judgments.
|
|
| Henss, R. (1991). Perceiving age and attractiveness in facial photographs. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 933-946. | ||
|
Key Words
|
physical attractiveness, age perception,
consensus, interjudge agreement, face perception
|
|
|
Summary
|
In two experiments,
492 male and female subjects from three different age groups estimated
the age of adult men and women on the basis of photographs and provided
attractiveness ratings of the stimulus persons. With regard to the age
estimates there was almost perfect agreement between the mean judgments
of the different groups, and there was high consensus among the individual
judges within each group. For each single picture, however, there was
high variability in the age estimates; and although the estimates were
generally quite accurate, in some cases they deviated substantially from
the stimulus person's true age. In both experiments there was a negative
relationship between age and attractiveness for female stimuli. For male
stimuli a negative relationship was found in one experiment only, whereas
in the other experiment these two variables were almost uncorrelated.
Both experiments yielded two kinds of ingroup-favoritism: The relationship
between age and attractiveness was seen to be less negative (a) when the
judges and the judged were of the same sex, and (b) when the subjects
themselves belonged to the oldest age group.
|
|